The Social Millionaire
Sold:$3,630.06
Friends:3,010

Archive for the ‘Technology’ Category

Droppped Spottt

Thursday, March 13th, 2008

I finally thought someone finally created the ultimate free traffic link exchange. Boy was I wrong!

Droppped Spottt The eye candy Spottt website has a cute adorable puppy that no webmaster could ignore until you bring it home and it starts barking viciously at you!

What exactly do I mean? Everyday I would log into this blog to see how things were going and to my horror Spottt would be running completely irrelevant banners. Then it clicked - if my website is showing irrelevant banners then my banner must be appearing on a completely irrelevant websites generating very low clicks.

So I dashed over to my Spottt account and to my horror found that I had 7 measly clicks for the over 10,000 page views I have generated for them. I do not even want to take the time to figure out the click-through rate on that but I know it ain’t gonna look pretty.

Part of this blog’s purpose is to show the readers what does and does not work in terms of bringing quality traffic. At this point Spottt does not bring any traffic let alone quality traffic. But - who knows this could always change!

Until then Spottt is in the dog house!

Web 2.0, Making The World a Better Place?

Thursday, March 6th, 2008

This blogging job is a lot harder than I thought so I give props to John Chow, Shoe Money and Michael Arrington who make it look so easy!

While I was running tonight I was trying to think of an interesting blog topic. This is what I came up with: Web 2.0, Making The World a Better Place?

Early entrepreneurs were involved in creating businesses that could create profits right away. Entrepreneurs like K. C. Irving and Sam Walton knew they had to create a business where there would be some return in investment quickly. Most people would agree this is the foundation of business, start a company that can make you lots of money.

When the internet first was born entrepreneurs were trying to gage how they could bring existing bricks and mortar companies to the online world. This created some of the most valuable internet companies like Amazon and eBay. Then came along a company called Google. They did not have any real plans of monetizing their service but they knew money would help them create a central place for the worlds information.

Investors and Venture Capitalists now realize how big of behemoth Google has become after their IPO. Investors try to focus on these services that have no real current monetization model in the hopes they eventually find one.

Investors do not want to miss out on another Google hence why Facebook is so highly valued and easily got funding. They are having current troubles monetizing though.

This began the real Web 2.o funding as I call it. Build a service that tailors to people then find a way to monetize it. Be people-centric not money-centric. Unfortunately a lot of entrepreneurs have problems monetizing their service once they have become popular with the ease of viral marketing in the Web 2.0 world.

Since the web is all about being people-centric now with no censorship (except in China and Australia) people can see the media in an unbiased or really biased opinion. They are now able to engage in comments and give their thoughts about news or articles. It has enabled Wikipedia to have some of the most updated Wikis on anything and monitored by anyone. So when your university professor tells you not to use Wikipedia for that reason be sure to mention to him that before Wikipedia anyone could write a book and have anyone from a publishing company read it and publish it. Don’t you think having millions of people reading and reviewing does a much better job? This in my opinion is why Web 2.0 helps make the world a better place.

The companies who will really cash out in the next 5 to 10 years are the ones who have spent the last 5 to 10 years acquiring a huge amount of users. Companies like Google, Microsoft and Yahoo are among them, as the world embraces Web 3.0 (semantic web) and OpenID.

Now services will be built around OpenID and the privacy of the users will rest in these big companies hands.

You may agree or disagree with my post but I would love to hear your points so please comment.

PayPal Fees

Wednesday, February 27th, 2008

As of today this website has sold a total of $46.05 of advertisements - so I wanted to do a little bit of digging to see exactly how much PayPal is taking for service fees!

For the $46.05 of advertisements I sold, PayPal took a total of $4.42.

So once I reach my goal of $1 million PayPal will take $95,982.63 in service fees based on how they have charged me so far.

I could use any provider like 2Checkout or Google Checkout and lower the fees. I use PayPal because from my research in internet marketing it converts better and they provide an excellent service. Wish Marketing Experiments would do an experiment on this.

Plus I do not mind help boosting eBay’s shares since Peter Thiel has a nice chunk of shares since he sold PayPal to eBay for $1.5 billion. It is pretty cool that Peter Thiel invested $3.5 million to Aubrey de Grey’s Methuselah Mouse Prize to help combat aging. Here is Aubrey’s video from TED:

Aubrey de Grey


© Copyright 2008, Pat Hankinson. All Rights Reserved!